Regulations · March 30, 2026
TR CU 004 and 020: what electronics and household appliances need
Why electronics need two documents, and when a third one is added.
For equipment, the document of conformity is the tip of the iceberg. Below it is the safety justification: the risk analysis and calculations that the manufacturer must prepare and hand over together with the machine.
Equipment differs from consumer goods in that the document of conformity is only the tip of the iceberg. Below it is the safety justification: calculations, a risk analysis and a description of protective measures that the manufacturer must prepare and keep. Importers usually learn about this when the certification body asks for a document that the foreign supplier does not have in the required form.
TR CU 010/2011 applies to machinery and equipment used in industry and at home, and also to their components that affect safety. These are machine tools, pumps, compressors, conveyors, lifting machines, agricultural and construction machinery, woodworking and food processing equipment, and household machines that are not covered by other regulations.
The regulation does not apply to products that have special regulations: lifts, pressure equipment, equipment for explosive atmospheres, measuring instruments, and railway and road transport. The first thing to find out is whether your object has been moved to a separate regulation, because the whole further procedure depends on this.
The regulation divides equipment by the degree of risk. Products included in the list in the annex to the regulation must be subject to mandatory certification. Everything else that falls within the scope is subject to declaration.
The list for certification includes machinery with a high potential to cause harm: woodworking equipment, presses, casting machines, lifting machines, equipment for work in mines, centrifuges, industrial tractors, earth-moving machines and other heavy machinery.
| Certification | Declaration | |
|---|---|---|
| Who is responsible for the decision | Certification body | Applicant |
| Tests | Mandatory, in an accredited laboratory | Depends on the scheme |
| Analysis of the state of production | In some schemes, yes | Not carried out |
| Inspection control | Yes, during the validity period | No |
The scheme depends on what you import or make: a series, a batch or a single unit.
| Scheme | Object | Features |
|---|---|---|
| 1c | Serial production | Tests of a type sample, analysis of the state of production, inspection control |
| 3c | Batch | Tests of samples from the batch |
| 4c | Single item | Tests of the item itself |
| 9c | Batch or single item | Based on analysis of the technical documentation, for complex machinery of limited use |
| 1d–6d | Series or batch | Declaration; the set of evidence depends on the scheme |
Scheme 9c is the most frequent choice for single deliveries of expensive industrial equipment, when it makes no economic sense to test a machine by destructive methods. The basis is the manufacturer’s technical documentation, and the requirements for its completeness are the highest here.
The regulation requires the manufacturer to prepare a safety justification when it designs the equipment. This is a document that contains a risk analysis and data from the design documentation on the minimum necessary safety measures.
What it must contain:
The safety justification is kept by the manufacturer and is passed on, together with the equipment, to the person who operates it. For imports this means that you need to obtain the document from the foreign supplier. Often it has to be prepared again, because the European technical file under the Machinery Directive is similar in meaning but is not the same in content.
Operating documents are a mandatory part of the set, and their absence is a violation of the requirements of the regulation in itself. The operating manual must contain information about the design, the principle of operation, the characteristics, the safety measures, the procedure for installation, start-up, adjustment, maintenance and repair, and about critical failures and the actions of personnel in such cases.
The requirement that is violated most often in imports: operating documents must be made in Russian and in the state languages of the member states where such requirements exist. A machine translation of the manual, in which the safety terms are translated at random, is a typical claim during inspection control.
A marking is applied to the machine, and it contains:
The marking must remain for the whole service life. A paper sticker on an industrial machine tool does not meet this requirement. A metal nameplate is usually used.
This is a separate and painful topic. The regulation applies to equipment whether it is new or used, if it is put into circulation in the territory of the Union for the first time. This means that importing a second-hand machine tool from Europe does not remove the need for conformity assessment.
The difficulty is that for machinery made many years ago the seller usually has no technical file, no calculations and no manufacturer ready to confirm anything. The practical way is to issue the documents under the scheme for a single item, with tests and with a safety justification prepared with the help of engineers. This is more expensive and takes longer than the buyer expects, so you should assess the documents before the deal.
A certificate for serial products is accompanied by inspection control: the certification body periodically checks that the products still match the confirmed sample. It checks the state of production, selects samples and analyses complaints.
Avoiding inspection control leads to suspension or termination of the certificate. For an importer this means that the document that was paid for stops being valid at the worst moment, at the time of the next delivery. You can find more about the procedure itself in the article on inspection control.
Technical regulations state the requirements in a general form: a machine must be safe, and risks must be reduced. How to achieve this is described by the standards that are included in the lists to the regulation.
Using such standards is voluntary, but it gives a presumption of conformity: if the equipment is made to a standard from the list, the requirements of the regulation are considered to be met. Refusing the standard is not forbidden, but then you must prove conformity yourself, by calculations and tests, and this work is much larger.
For imported equipment this is also a way to save money: if the manufacturer applied international standards that are harmonized with ours, part of the evidence can be reused. If only internal factory norms were applied, the work must be done again.
This question arises when a production line of several machines is delivered. The answer depends on how the machines are connected.
| Situation | How it is issued |
|---|---|
| Separate machines that work independently | A document for each machine |
| A line with a single control system that works as a whole | It is issued as one machine, and the risk assessment is made for the line |
| A machine plus interchangeable equipment | A document for the machine; the interchangeable equipment is assessed separately |
| Components that do not work on their own | They are not confirmed separately and are part of the machine |
The main trap is a line built from machines of different manufacturers. Each machine may have its own documents, but putting them together into one complex creates new risks: the interaction between units, the common emergency stop system and the zones between the machines. The person who builds the line becomes the manufacturer of the complex and is responsible for the risk assessment of the whole line.
Conformity assessment settles the question of putting the product into circulation, but not of its operation. After installation, the equipment is subject to other rules, those of industrial safety, and they have their own requirements.
Modernization needs a separate mention. Replacing the control system, installing an additional unit or changing the output can change the characteristics of the machine so much that the documents no longer describe it. In this situation the organization that carried out the modernization in fact creates a new machine, with all the resulting duties.
This list saves months. It is harder to obtain all these documents after payment than before it.
| Document | Why it is needed |
|---|---|
| Technical file or its equivalent | The basis for the safety justification |
| List of the standards applied | Shows how far the evidence can be reused |
| Diagrams: electrical, hydraulic, pneumatic | Needed for the risk analysis and the operating documents |
| Calculations of protective devices and guards | They confirm that the protective measures are sufficient |
| Factory test reports | Part of the evidence |
| Operating manual in the original language | The basis for a translation, not for a machine paraphrase |
| Data on noise and vibration levels | Mandatory characteristics for the documentation |
| Data for the nameplate: model, year, serial number | Needed for the marking |
A separate piece of advice on the contract: include the supplier’s duty to provide the technical documentation in the volume that is needed for conformity assessment in the territory of the Union, and link part of the payment to it. The wording “documents are provided on request” does not work in practice.
| Mistake | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Only a certificate under 010 was issued, without 004 and 020 | Electrical safety and EMC are not confirmed |
| There is no safety justification | The set is incomplete, and the document can be challenged |
| The manual was translated by machine translation | A claim during control, and a risk of wrong operation |
| The marking is applied as a sticker | It does not last for the service life |
| A used machine tool was imported without conformity assessment | It is impossible to put it into circulation legally |
| A line was built from machines of different suppliers without a risk assessment of the complex | The assembler is responsible, and the risks at the joints are not assessed |
| Inspection control was missed | Suspension of the certificate |
The first row occurs more often than all the others together: the applicant issues a document under the “main” regulation and considers the matter closed, although the electrical part of the machine needs confirmation under two other regulations.
These are three characteristics that importers notice last, although they are regulated in the same way as mechanical safety and must be stated in the documentation.
Data on noise and vibration are taken from the factory tests. If the supplier did not provide them, the measurements will have to be made here, which means extra cost and time. So include this request in the list of documents in the contract, together with the diagrams and calculations.
It is easier to determine the list of regulations if you start with classification: the HS code (TN VED) is the starting point for finding the requirements. This is explained in a separate article. How the scheme affects the set of documents and the terms was explained in the article on conformity assessment schemes.
Regulations · March 30, 2026
Why electronics need two documents, and when a third one is added.
For manufacturers · May 9, 2026
How the periodic check goes, and what happens if you fail it.
Regulations · April 2, 2026
How the scheme affects the set of documents, the testing and the time to get the document.