For importers · February 16, 2026
Certificate or declaration: how to understand what your product needs
How the forms of conformity confirmation differ, and who chooses the right one.
Conformity assessment of food products does not start at the certification body but at the production site. Without working HACCP procedures, there is nothing on which to adopt a declaration.
Food products are the only large category where conformity assessment almost never starts with a visit to the certification body. It starts at the production site: until procedures based on the HACCP principles are in place, there is nothing on which to adopt a declaration. This is the main difference between TR CU 021/2011 and the regulations for clothing or electronics, and it is where newcomers most often stumble.
TR CU 021/2011 “On safety of food products” applies to all food products put into circulation in the territory of the Union, and also to the processes of their production, storage, transport, sale and disposal. It covers raw materials, finished products and public catering, as far as processes are concerned.
It is important that 021 almost never works alone. It is a framework regulation: it sets the general safety requirements and the rules of conformity assessment, and you must look for the specific indicators for your product in the product-specific regulations.
| Product | Which regulations apply together with 021 |
|---|---|
| Dairy products | TR CU 033/2013, 022/2011 (labelling), 005/2011 (packaging) |
| Meat products | TR CU 034/2013, 022/2011, 005/2011 |
| Juices, nectars, fruit drinks | TR CU 023/2011, 022/2011, 005/2011 |
| Oils, margarines, spreads | TR CU 024/2011, 022/2011, 005/2011 |
| Fish and seafood | TR EAEU 040/2016, 022/2011, 005/2011 |
| Grain | TR CU 015/2011, 022/2011 |
| Products with food additives and flavourings | TR CU 029/2012 in addition to the product-specific regulation |
The practical conclusion: the list of regulations for one can of preserves often has three or four items, and the declaration is adopted for all of them at once. If you miss one of them, you get a document that formally does not cover the whole product.
For the great majority of food products, the regulation provides for declaration of conformity and not for certification. The difference is basic: the declaration is adopted by the applicant itself, and the applicant itself is responsible for the accuracy of the data in it. The certification body does not issue a document to you. You declare conformity under your own responsibility, and the test reports serve as the evidence.
From this follows something that many learn too late: the responsibility for the content of the declaration lies entirely with the applicant. If a test report was obtained for a sample that does not represent the serial product, the laboratory will not be the one to answer.
Some categories of food products are taken out of declaration and placed under state registration. These are specialized products: baby food, food for athletes, dietary therapeutic and preventive food, dietary supplements, and mineral water of some categories. A state registration certificate is issued for them, and a declaration does not replace it.
The scheme decides what exactly is the evidence and who carries out the tests.
| Scheme | For what | Features |
|---|---|---|
| 1d | Serial production | Tests of samples in the applicant’s own laboratory or in a third-party laboratory; the applicant builds the evidence |
| 2d | Batch | Tests of a batch; the declaration is valid only for it |
| 3d | Serial production | Tests in an accredited laboratory |
| 4d | Batch or single item | Tests in an accredited laboratory |
| 6d | Serial production | Needs a certified food safety management system |
For serial production, 1d or 3d is used most often. Scheme 6d is attractive because it relies on a certified food safety management system, but this means a prior certification of the management system, which is a separate project with its own terms.
A declaration for serial production is issued for up to five years. No term is set for a batch: the document is valid exactly as long as this batch exists.
Article 10 of the regulation requires the manufacturer to develop, implement and maintain procedures based on the HACCP principles when it carries out production processes. The wording is important: the regulation does not require an ISO 22000 certificate and does not require you to “implement HACCP” as a purchase of documents. It requires working procedures.
In practice this means the following minimum.
The inspecting body looks not at whether a folder exists but at the records: whether the logs are filled in every day, whether the data match reality, and what happened on the day when the temperature went outside the limit. A set of documents printed a week before the inspection is recognized at once.
The specific list depends on the product, but the structure is almost always the same.
| Group of indicators | What is checked |
|---|---|
| Microbiological | QMAFAnM (total viable count), coliform bacteria (BGKP), pathogenic microorganisms, yeasts and moulds |
| Toxic elements | Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury |
| Pesticides and radionuclides | Residual quantities, specific activity |
| Mycotoxins | For cereals, nuts and dried fruit |
| Physico-chemical | Mass fraction of moisture, fat and protein, and acidity, according to the product-specific regulation |
| Indicators of oxidative spoilage | For products that contain fat |
Shelf life is a separate topic. If you set the shelf life yourself and do not take it from a standard in force, you must justify it by storage studies. This is not a formality: a shelf life that is declared “by eye” is one of the typical claims during control.
Labelling is checked most often, because no laboratory is needed for it; it is enough to pick up the package. The mandatory information is:
Allergens need a separate mention: they are stated regardless of the quantity if they were used in production. Wording such as “may contain traces” does not remove the need to state what is really in the formulation.
Meat, milk, fish, eggs and products made from them are subject to veterinary control in addition to technical regulation. This is a separate system with its own requirements: the production site must be attested, and the products are accompanied by veterinary accompanying documents that are issued in electronic form.
In practice this means that the enterprise goes through two independent procedures: one under technical regulation (the declaration) and the other under the veterinary line (attestation of the site and electronic veterinary certification). A declaration does not replace veterinary documents, and the reverse is also true.
Before you select samples, you need to answer the question: what exactly must your product conform to? There are two options: to work to an interstate or national standard in force, or to develop your own document, that is, technical specifications or an organization standard.
Working to a standard in force is simpler: the requirements are already stated, the indicators are known, and the laboratory understands what to measure. But the standard sets strict limits on the formulation and the name. As soon as the product goes beyond them, for example when you make condensed milk with a milk fat substitute, you cannot work to the standard for condensed milk, and you will have to change the name of the product as well.
Your own technical specifications give freedom in the formulation, but you must set yourself the quality and safety indicators, the control methods, the acceptance rules, the storage conditions and the shelf life. This is a document that both the laboratory and the inspector will read later, so its wording must be measurable. You can read more about what such a document contains in the article on technical specifications.
In imports the scheme changes in details, not in substance: a declaration is still needed, and the applicant is the importer or the person who performs the functions of the foreign manufacturer and is registered in the Union.
A separate difficulty is the conformity of the foreign formulation with the requirements of the Union. Food additives that are permitted in the country of production may not be permitted here, or may be permitted in other concentrations. Check the composition before you sign the contract and not after the test results.
The regulation requires traceability: for any unit of product, it must be possible to restore the chain from the raw material supplier to the buyer of the batch. This is not an abstract requirement. The recall procedure is built on it.
If a non-conformity is found, the manufacturer must stop production, withdraw the products from circulation and give notice of this. The practical value of traceability is that it decides the scale of losses: with good records, a specific batch is recalled, and without records, the whole volume for the period.
| Mistake | What it leads to |
|---|---|
| The declaration does not name all the regulations | Some requirements are formally not confirmed |
| The name in the declaration does not match the label | The document does not relate to the product on the shelf |
| The shelf life was set without storage studies | A claim during control, and a risk of spoilage in circulation |
| Allergens are not shown in the labelling | A direct violation of the requirements of regulation 022 |
| The declaration was adopted before HACCP was implemented | The evidence is incomplete |
| The formulation was changed and the documents were not reviewed | The declaration in force describes a different product |
| The test report was obtained for a sample that does not represent the series | The test results do not relate to the product that is made |
The first two rows give more than half of all claims, and they are found in a minute: it is enough to compare the text of the declaration with the label. The other typical slips in documents are covered in a separate article.
The exact terms depend on the product, but it is useful to understand the order of magnitude in advance, so that you do not set a launch date earlier than the documents can physically be ready.
| Stage | What decides the duration |
|---|---|
| Development of the technical specifications | The complexity of the formulation, the existence of analogues |
| Implementation of HACCP procedures | The state of production, the readiness of the staff to keep records |
| Shelf life studies | The claimed term itself: confirming it takes storage time |
| Laboratory tests | Microbiology needs time for culturing |
| Registration of the declaration | Readiness of the set and the availability of an electronic signature |
The most underestimated item is shelf life studies. A shelf life of six months can be confirmed in less than six months only by accelerated methods, and they cannot be used for every product. Plan the launch of a product with a long shelf life with this in mind.
The order here is not arbitrary. Tests before HACCP is implemented are a common mistake: the test report is obtained, but it is too early to adopt the declaration, because the evidence is incomplete.
The declaration is registered in the FGIS register of Rosaccreditation in electronic form and is signed with the applicant’s qualified electronic signature. A paper form with a body’s stamp is an outdated practice: the entry in the register has legal force and not the printout. Anyone can check any document by its number, including your buyer and the marketplace.
The applicant can be the manufacturer, the seller or a person who performs the functions of the foreign manufacturer and is registered in the Union. For imported products this is usually the importer, and the importer is responsible for the data in the declaration.
An adopted declaration does not close the question forever. State control checks that the products match what was declared: it takes samples in retail, compares the labelling and asks for HACCP records. If the products do not conform, the declaration can be recognized as invalid, and the products must be withdrawn from circulation.
A separate risk is a change of the formulation or of the raw material supplier without a review of the documents. Formally the declaration remains valid, but in fact it describes a different product. Any change of composition, technology or packaging is a reason to check whether it is time to issue the documents again.
For importers · February 16, 2026
How the forms of conformity confirmation differ, and who chooses the right one.
For manufacturers · February 10, 2026
Who takes the samples, how many are needed, and how the sampling act is drawn up.
For manufacturers · March 8, 2026
When your own standard is needed, and what it consists of.